So I see what you are saying, however, I don't think that's the case.
I don't think YouTube would, for example, cite 'their 1st Amendment Rights' as legitimacy for censoring content on their site.
I don't think YouTube would, for example, cite 'their 1st Amendment Rights' as legitimacy for censoring content on their site.
It does, just in that YouTube is the possessor of the right, not the restricted governing party.