Re:Cloth masks do protect the wearer
by waterheater on Monday August 31, 2020 @08:12PM
(#24337199)
>the publishers felt it was doing more harm than good and took it down for that reason.
Then the publishers should come out and say so by putting a tagline or disclaimer at the top of the article. Pulling the whole article to "supervise[] conduct and morals" [1] is textbook censorship.
Re:Cloth masks do protect the wearer
by dandelany on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @12:25AM
(#24338551)
/shrug It’s self-censorship. Publications commonly unpublish bad articles for a wide variety of reasons. Should one not supervise one’s own conduct and morals?
Then the publishers should come out and say so by putting a tagline or disclaimer at the top of the article. Pulling the whole article to "supervise[] conduct and morals" [1] is textbook censorship.
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censoring