Re:Don't Be a Sucker
by AlexTWithBeard on Monday August 31, 2020 @03:48PM
(#24335255)
> economic security for all who are ... unwilling to work.
goes slightly beyond investment into infrastructure
Re:Don't Be a Sucker
by sudosysgen on Monday August 31, 2020 @03:57PM
(#24335344)
Economic security for people who are unwilling to work is a basic feature of most advanced economies. See the BS in Québec, the RSI in France, and so on. There was a time in the US when it was a thing too.
Re:Don't Be a Sucker
by AlexTWithBeard on Monday August 31, 2020 @04:27PM
(#24335581)
Regardless of whether it's implemented in certain countries, the idea that society must support those unwilling to work seems to be quite far on left side of the spectrum.
The "you don't work - you don't eat" idea is not "rightists". It's just a basic law of nature.
Re:Don't Be a Sucker
by sudosysgen on Monday August 31, 2020 @04:46PM
(#24335767)
"You don't work - you don't eat" isn't a reality anywhere in the world today. It's not a basic law of nature, it's a delusion. The world doesn't actually work like that.
Do you think that the Republicans are quite far on the left side of the spectrum? Because last I've heard they haven't repealed food stamps yet.
When AOC shows support to a Marxist-Leninist State and party, and when she loudly claims for the seizure of the means of production, you'll have a point. So far, the most extreme thing she's advocating for is Nationalized Healthcare and investment in infrastructure. I don't really think you can equate that with complaining about the white genocide. Her policies and rhetoric are at the very most that of a left-leaning liberal anywhere else in the world.
So no, your argument doesn't really hold up.
If you're going to claim that the Democrats were collaborating with the Soviets, I'd like to remind you that Mccarthy was a Democrat.