Re:WebBundles are built for content-addressable networks
by gumby on Sunday August 30, 2020 @12:58PM
(#24324072)
WebBundles are the CDROMs of 2020 and solve nothing for the end user. It’s all about those ads.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WebBundles are built for content-addressable networks
by spankalee on Sunday August 30, 2020 @03:37PM
(#24325308)
Are you claiming that everyone should stop using Webpack and Rollup too?
Re:WebBundles are built for content-addressable networks
by gumby on Sunday August 30, 2020 @09:54PM
(#24327796)
I know that rollup in particular is intended to collect all your JS modules, somewhat like an .a file in your filesystem, but Webpack can easily combine all the assets.
In both cases you’re downloading globs of stuff that could already be in your cache, or that you don’t want to download at all (e.g. ads). I have never approved of efforts to turn the web into a “TV remote with a ‘Buy’ button” (which stretches back decades) but indeed, I consider such projects pernicious.
Re:WebBundles are built for content-addressable networks
by jrururufuf666 on Sunday August 30, 2020 @02:13PM
(#24324687)
the continued trend of overcomplicating things with 100 frameworks. i miss ftp'ing my html site to geocities
Re:WebBundles are built for content-addressable networks
by jrururufuf666 on Sunday August 30, 2020 @02:15PM
(#24324701)
"build process" for a webpage nowadays.. hahaha i got into web stuff for being interpreted and instant results, and now you gotta compile your bundles.