News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ArangoDB 3.7 – a big step forward for multi-model by oxfordmale on Saturday August 29, 2020 @02:00PM (#24318088)
The below is not a seven year old meme:

Even at the strongest levels of read and write concern, MongoDB 4.2.6 failed to preserve snapshot isolation. Instead, Jepsen observed read skew, cyclic information flow, duplicate writes, and internal consistency violations. Weak defaults meant that transactions could lose writes and allow dirty reads, even downgrading requested safety levels at the database and collection level.

Re:ArangoDB 3.7 – a big step forward for multi-model by asya999 on Saturday August 29, 2020 @08:25PM (#24320372)
That was a result of a bug https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-48307 in the retry mechanism when commitTransaction failed to return a response and has been fixed in 4.2.8. Not all databases have memes, I have a high degree of certainty all of them have bugs.
Re:ArangoDB 3.7 – a big step forward for multi-model by fortran77 on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @09:14AM (#24352859)
I find MongoDB to be a very reliable database as long as I build my apps to tolerate losing data.
Re:ArangoDB 3.7 – a big step forward for multi-model by jd_mongodb on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @09:18AM (#24352900)
If you have ever lost data running MongoDB (whether you are a paying customer or not) we want to hear about that and fix it. We treat any instance of data loss as a high priority bug.