Re:Facebook Employees Slam Zuckerberg over Militia Groups an...
by CompanionCuuube on Friday August 28, 2020 @08:34PM
(#24312109)
> both for ethical and commercial reasons
But primarily commercial reasons related to having a completely different distribution model.
Re:Facebook Employees Slam Zuckerberg over Militia Groups an...
by thu2111 on Saturday August 29, 2020 @09:47AM
(#24316060)
They've been promoting other ills to their readers instead, e.g. conspiracy theories about Russia. And they do it non-algorithmically, i.e. knowingly, and isn't that worse? At least with an algorithm the creator can claim any independent decision it makes wasn't an intended outcome. Journalists don't get to say that.
Re:Facebook Employees Slam Zuckerberg over Militia Groups an...
by JamisonM on Saturday August 29, 2020 @12:14PM
(#24317120)
If you are implying that coverage of Russian election interference is promoting conspiracy theories, then you would need to contend with the actual facts of the Russian efforts to influence US electoral politics to make that case.
Even if you held that coverage of Russia's role in the 2016 election was promotion of a conspiracy theory it would still be an obvious false equivalence to compare that to the promotion of groups like Bugaloo (that has killed multiple federal officers) or QAnon (which has resulted in multiple kidnappings, many other crimes, and promotes the worst antisemetic conspiracies invented, and more far more absurd things).
Holding broadcasters accountable is easier than holding "narrowcasters" like Facebook accountable because you don't see what narrowcasters are promoting. But when you do find out you see that it is things that broadcasters would never push both for ethical and commercial reasons. This is important to consider.