News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male – ne... by nradov on Friday August 28, 2020 @12:07PM (#24306570)
SARS-CoV-2 isn't very novel. The long-term clinical effects appear to be fairly similar to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. There are thousands of survivors from those earlier epidemics whom we can study.

Obviously we can't just sit around for years and wait for evidence to appear. We'll have to move forward based on incomplete information, knowing that some of it will later prove to have been wrong.

Re:Coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male – ne... by acituan on Friday August 28, 2020 @12:22PM (#24306749)
> SARS-CoV-2 isn't very novel. The long-term clinical effects appear to be fairly similar to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV

Sure, novel is a sliding scale. But it has been novel enough for our immune systems, and that is sufficient reason to be cautious. Also its epidemiologic profile was sufficiently different that our knowledge with sars or mers didn’t help us being in a pandemic right now, which can’t be entirely explained with bad policy decisions.

Re:Coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male – ne... by jjeaff on Friday August 28, 2020 @02:57PM (#24308688)
How can we say the long term effects of sars/mers appear to be similar to covid when we have zero data on long term effects of covid?

I'm no expert. But I am reticent to think that sars/mers and covid are going to have similar long term effects. Mostly due to the strange additional symptoms with covid that don't appear to happen with Sars/mers. Loss of taste and smell is one of them. Infected and inflamed extremeties is another. It seems as though covid is more adept at infecting other types of human tissue rather than just respiratory. Which on a micro level might be a rather small difference but could have very serious long term differences in outcomes.