She was pretty risqué in her social media photos/videos before onlyfans and garnered quite a following online because of it. Most of her popularity online had nothing to do with her acting career at all.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2020-08-28/...
The only "positive" thing in her towards contributing to a better humanity is the words of donating to charity (aka tax breaks).
Having sex in front of a camera is a profession, I get that, but she is still a nobody. A nobody with money. But still a nobody (in my book). I am not forcing anyone to have the same criteria of what I consider as "decent human being" that I have developed as my silly(?) standards.
Nothing negative for her, but definitely nothing positive for her either. Just a zero.
I don't follow OnlyFans progress and I have no idea how many "content creators" they got and what is the "fanbase", but if a 20yo nobody with a nice body can take $1m in 24h (then I assume that is with 1-3-6-... months subscriptions)(so she won't bring in another $1m the next day as well). OnlyFans keeps 15-20-25%? And Stripe/WF share a 1-2%? And OnlyFans has 10-20 people of that "caliber" like Mrs Thorne? They won't complain for a long time.
I assume that the OP writing about millions, he/she means revenue, not Stripe/WF profits from the fees.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/26/entertainment/bella-thorn...
Edit: I couldn't remember the site, I DuckDuckGo-ed and this piece of news appears in many sites, I chose CNN as I didn't recognize most other "celebrity news" sites.