Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by saagarjha on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:23PM
(#24298205)
Rich people have money, but they aren't stupid: why would they throw their money away on nonrenewable energy when they can just switch to something cheaper?
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by monadic2 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:23PM
(#24298217)
> Rich people have money, but they aren't stupid: why would they throw their money away on nonrenewable energy when they can just switch to something cheaper?
What alternative is there to a private jet or a yacht? No, you have to get the fear of prison (or worse) in them to get them to act in a socially rational manner.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by AnthonyMouse on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:41PM
(#24298394)
To begin with, private jets and yachts are a trivial proportion of carbon emissions, so they're not really what matters.
But to actually answer your question, battery-electric yachts or aviation powered by biofuels.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by monadic2 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @05:51PM
(#24299100)
Sure, but it's rather indicative of larger use of carbon emitting technology. Neither of your suggested replacements actually exist in any meaningful way, and virtually every investment comes with significant CO2 emissions.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by AnthonyMouse on Thursday August 27, 2020 @06:24PM
(#24299376)
Battery-electric yachts and biofuels aren't popular because they're more expensive, not because there is any technological barrier to their existence. Make them the less expensive option and market demand for them increases.
Yea, this just isn't true. Rich people will just pay more for the same thing. Poor people will just have to pay more to even get to their jobs. It's pure laziness to put this on dogma rather than actually come up with decent policy to shape the market.