Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by markdown on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:09PM
(#24297402)
Sounds like something else is going on. There shouldn't be much difference between the amount of water flowing into and out of a hydro dam.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by mullingitover on Thursday August 27, 2020 @03:26PM
(#24297615)
It's not about the water flow, it's that there's a physical barrier that blocks migrating fish from going between the river and the bays/estuaries/ocean.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by markdown on Thursday August 27, 2020 @08:22PM
(#24300195)
Most fish species don't migrate.
Re:Wind and solar are cheaper than thought, admits UK govern...
by mullingitover on Thursday August 27, 2020 @10:01PM
(#24300682)
I mean, that's true, but also every fish species listed in the above quote does, and were severely negatively impacted by the dam. They in turn feed a large amount of other wildlife.
> “The river was transformed from being a thriving producer of millions of fish such as shad, herring, striped bass, Atlantic salmon, sturgeon and alewives and supporting a wide cornucopia of other species ranging from otters to eagles — into a wastewater drainage system,” Jeff Crane, a dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at Saint Martin’s University, wrote in a paper published in 2009.
https://therevelator.org/edwards-dam-removal/