Re:An Archive of a Different Type
by yorwba on Thursday August 27, 2020 @12:01PM
(#24294992)
Linked from a comment in the languagehat article is the Wikipedia talk page for the "Burmese alphabet" article, which puts that claim into doubt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Burmese_alphabet#Glyph_in...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An Archive of a Different Type
by toomuchtodo on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:49PM
(#24298492)
A friend is reaching out to Ian Frazer, who authored a piece called "typewriter man" that references this claim, to obtain the provenance of it. I will return to provide an update (and update Wikipedia), if something of substance results.
If I don't return before the reply window closes for this thread, check Wikipedia for those who encounter this thread in the future.
I'm going to trust the family over Wikipedia.
Re:An Archive of a Different Type
by toomuchtodo on Thursday August 27, 2020 @07:15PM
(#24299745)
I didn’t say they were lying. I thought it’d be enjoyable to keep pulling the historical thread to see where it leads and codify it in a knowledge repository of some permanence (stick the docs into an IA item, cite it in Wikipedia). Scratching my digital historian itch, doing the future a favor, that’s all.
Regardless, thanks for the post, I really enjoyed a peak into Pearl and Martin’s work, and yours.
I have a reaction when we've got years (and years and years) of this and someone says "well, they're fighting about it on Wikipedia" like that means a single darn thing.
Glad you like the stuff; always up for people having the specific link.
Re:An Archive of a Different Type
by toomuchtodo on Thursday August 27, 2020 @08:52PM
(#24300348)
I don’t blame you at all. I just wanted to make my intent clear.