An implication of this is that short-haul applications will see neither the speed more the mileage advertised. I still want to see the general design principles applied to the problem of regional feeder flights, it won't be quite as over the top impressive but it would still be the closest to "slow steaming" available
(speed really doesn't matter on feeder connections where boarding alone takes longer than the flight, but it's very hard for aircraft to trade speed for efficiency once non-negligible payloads are involved)
The engine basically sounds like two in-line six cylinder engines that share many common single engine features but with the ability to shut off one side and use power from the remaining side.
So hypothetically, you fly up to altitude and climb using all 12 cylinders, then cruise on six.
That could be where the fuel efficiency is being notched up versus burning all 12 cylinders at all times.
Kinda like how people are still amazed variable displacement engines took them from 10mpg to 18-20mpg. It's also likely the engine has a number of other more recent innovations included too. Variable valve timing, etc, etc. A lot of new rather exciting new engine technology has come out in the last 20 years.
It's much like when we went from naturally aspirated aka carbs to electronic fuel injection/ignition.
You can have a naturally aspirated engine with electronic (even direct) injection, or a turbocharged engine with a carburetor, or any other combination.
I just wish carbureted was an easier word to spell after not using it for months at time.
I have a hard time believing they can get to such speed with just 500hp.