Re:2,000-year-old redwoods survive wildfire at California's ...
by ouroboros1 on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @08:21PM
(#24277797)
> However, I think a far more important aspect is how much more active the system as a whole gets. I don't have time to get into it in detail here, but overall that means there will be more and more extremes. More droughts. More floods. More severe winds. More heat waves. More freezing storms.
I don't think there is much evidence to support this relationship. I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
Re:2,000-year-old redwoods survive wildfire at California's ...
by eloff on Wednesday August 26, 2020 @12:32AM
(#24279144)
Basically as you add energy to the system things get more extreme. Storms including hurricanes and monsoons. Dry places and times get dryer due to increased evaporation. Wet places and times get wetter (more severe floods). It's a predictable consequence of higher temperatures.
Re:2,000-year-old redwoods survive wildfire at California's ...
by ouroboros1 on Friday September 04, 2020 @10:02PM
(#24380815)
Ah! Thank you
"Global Warming"/"Climate Change" is, to state something pretty obvious, about additional energy in an active system. That means, of course, more total heat across the entire system.
However, I think a far more important aspect is how much more active the system as a whole gets. I don't have time to get into it in detail here, but overall that means there will be more and more extremes. More droughts. More floods. More severe winds. More heat waves. More freezing storms. We're already seeing that in action and the rate at which the number of extremes increase will tend to increase as more energy is sent into a somewhat chaotic system.