I'm calling baloney on the "fact-based information". That's not an objective source; that's a true believer being a cheerleader.
TBH I should have looked at the author more carefully - I thought the page was like the NYU equivalent of Stanford’s online encyclopedia of Philosophy, sort of an anodyne online primer.
Thanks for pointing that out.
However based on my understanding I will say that most is the article seems pretty on point as being a description of the basics of Marx / Marxist thought.
I’ll also throw in that I think this is the thought that should demand our attention:
> The most powerful nation in history cannot erase poverty, provide full employment, guarantee decent housing or an adequate diet or good health care to its people. Meanwhile, the rich get richer.
Don’t have to be Marxist to see that.
> Don’t have to be Marxist to see that.
No. And you can see the consequences that are plastered all over the evening news.
Whether Marx has the right solution is a different question. But the problem is real. (Myself, I'd be inclined to say that Germany has a better solution than either the US or Marx. But I've never lived and worked in that system, so I don't really know.)
And yeah I like the German social-democrat model too.
Also, big-ups to us for having a fairly civil conversation : ).
Lol I think there was a Marxist hiding under my bed to get me the other night ;).
Such an easy boogie-man word to use.
Even scarier are those “cultural marxists.”
Here’s some fact-based information: https://www.nyu.edu/projects/ollman/docs/what_is_marxism.php