News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by WhompingWindows on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:24PM (#24262957)
It's too easy for rich successful people who have made it to declare that you should follow your passion. We wouldn't hear a quote from the dozens of lesser-known physicists who struggled and wouldn't recommend the field, we just hear the quote from Feynman who was the lucky one.

For instance, I love painting and woodworking, but I suffer no illusions that I would do "well" in those fields, as even far more talented and experienced individuals that I know in those fields are struggling mightily and envy my hobbyist status.

Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by lazerpants on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:56PM (#24263350)
I know and deal with some physicists and they all seem really happy and only one of them is famous/rich. The fact that you can always bail and go to finance seems to be a good backstop for them.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by ErikAugust on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:53PM (#24263325)
They clearly aren't struggling if you think they are far more talented. They are just struggling financially. Which is what all these hang-ups are about, including your own.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by irishloop on Monday August 24, 2020 @02:43PM (#24263926)
It's not a hang up if you can't pay your bills or afford to take a vacation once in a while. Mazlow's Hierarchy of Needs does require us to meet some basic needs regardless of our passions.

Even if you are an extraordinary woodworker, if you can barely meet rent, you are unlikely to find any happiness due to the stress you will need to manage day-to-day.

Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by grasshopperpurp on Monday August 24, 2020 @02:14PM (#24263574)
Quote would have been better if he said "and can" after "and want." But, as general advice, I think it's still pretty good.