Re:Challenge to scientists: does your ten-year-old code stil...
by throwawaygh on Monday August 24, 2020 @02:25PM
(#24263725)
> I'm not sure if this was meant to be a counter-argument to me
It wasn't :)
I'm not sure if this was meant to be a counter-argument to me, but I completely agree!
> "the code still runs and gives the same output" is not the same as reproducibility.
Yes, bit-for-bit identical results are neither necessary nor sufficient for reproducibility in the usual scientific sense.