News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Challenge to scientists: does your ten-year-old code stil... by djaque on Monday August 24, 2020 @12:27PM (#24262219)
Hello fellow accelerator physicist!

Yes I understand how seeding PRNGs work and I personally do that for my own code for debugging purposes. My point was that not using a fixed seed doesn't invalidate their result. It's just a cheap shot and, to me, demonstrates that the lockdownskeptics author doesn't have a real understanding of the methods being used.

Also, to be clear, I support open science and have some of my own open-source projects out in the wild (which is not the norm in my own field yet). I'm not arguing against releasing code, I'm arguing against OP arguing against this particular piece of code.

Re:Challenge to scientists: does your ten-year-old code stil... by SiempreViernes on Monday August 24, 2020 @12:35PM (#24262305)
Indeed it was a cheap shot, the code does give reproducible results: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01685-y

The main issue is if it used sensible inputs, but that's entirely different from code quality and requires subject matter expertise, so programmers don't bother with such details -_-