Re:Belgian experts 'shocked' as AstraZeneca seeks liability ...
by rightbyte on Sunday August 23, 2020 @03:51PM
(#24254749)
No amount of money will discover long term effects in the short term.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Belgian experts 'shocked' as AstraZeneca seeks liability ...
by rzzzt on Sunday August 23, 2020 @04:11PM
(#24254914)
A counterexample from a non-biological domain would be accelerated aging tests of electronic equipment. Could there be any similar approach that aims to do this in pharma testing?
Re:Belgian experts 'shocked' as AstraZeneca seeks liability ...
by kube-system on Sunday August 23, 2020 @05:07PM
(#24255301)
The project management triad doesn’t tell you what is scientifically possible — it tells you what is economically impossible.
Adding money won’t shorten the timeframe here, but shortening the timeframe adds potential risks (and risk=dollars)
Re:Belgian experts 'shocked' as AstraZeneca seeks liability ...
by rightbyte on Sunday August 23, 2020 @06:33PM
(#24255868)
You can maybe give higher doses or look really carefully for early signs of something being wrong? But I guess you can't do it as accurately as accelerated aging tests in eg. mechanics.
Re:Belgian experts 'shocked' as AstraZeneca seeks liability ...
by kube-system on Sunday August 23, 2020 @05:02PM
(#24255269)
The project management triad is a spectrum, not three boolean values, and not all of the areas of the triangle are necessarily within the bounds possible choices. (For example, consider how many bids you might expect on a project with a budget of zero)
Marginally speaking, governments are demanding this vaccine at same/lower prices and more accelerated timeline. AZ reasonably sees an associated rise in risk with this, which at the end of the day, is a cost for them.