News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Semi-transparent solar panels allow concurrent production... by samatman on Sunday August 23, 2020 @03:24PM (#24254548)
It's also unattractive, which should matter to us.

Much of the distinctive beauty of traditional building in sunny areas comes from the roofs.

Solar tiling, which is still not a mature technology, doesn't add danger: we have to put something on a roof, and if installing solar tile takes extra time, it isn't by much. And it looks good.

Less efficient and more expensive? Sure. But as the meme would have it, it's free real estate. And since we're living through a grotesque failure of robustness on a civilizational scale, let me point out that it's more robust as well, particularly combined with on-site batteries.

Re:Semi-transparent solar panels allow concurrent production... by Nasrudith on Sunday August 23, 2020 @04:53PM (#24255206)
Why do they count as unattractive? It seems that the "definition" of eyesore is wholey independent of aesthetics and entirely based upon if it is functional and new. Old windmills, steam engine trains, and canals are considered quaint, wind turbines, shipping canals and modern trains are considered "visual pollution". Modern art fixtures often deliberately defy all rules of structure and aesthetics and don't get tarred with this. I only have weird hypothesises as for why.
Re:Semi-transparent solar panels allow concurrent production... by chii on Sunday August 23, 2020 @09:54PM (#24256909)
> unattractive

people used to say wind turbines are unattractive. Culture determines what's attractive, and it can be made to look nice.