AI slays top F-16 pilot in DARPA dogfight simulation

Re:AI slays top F-16 pilot in DARPA dogfight simulation by salawat on Saturday August 22, 2020 @03:36PM (#24246669)

AI doesn't learn in it's production form. That's training. You'll get the same deterministic response pout of every fighter, even if there is So.e level of sensitive dependence on initial conditions.

Human pilots do mot suffer this problem. A human can arbitrarily change things up for better or worse. Going the AI route is basically going the T-34 route. Suddenly quantity (via reproducibility) takes on a quality all it's own. My issue with that philosophically is does going down that road actually solve any pressing problem?

Which to me it rings a bit hollow and empty unless there's so.e other task we'd prefer people that would be pilots be doing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI slays top F-16 pilot in DARPA dogfight simulation by hnick on Saturday August 22, 2020 @07:07PM (#24248003)

General AI probably would learn in real time by most definitions, but setting that aside for a moment I was more referring to gathering production data then using it later. You can gather then re-train, isn't that what Google is doing with our voice data for example?

[ Parent | on HN ]