Re:Code for The Economist's election model for 2020
by bioipbiop on Saturday August 22, 2020 @05:57AM
(#24243030)
Reading through both Nate’s twitter thread and the article, it reads like Nate never read the article. It seems to address every point he brought up in a reasonable manner. Odd.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Code for The Economist's election model for 2020
by OJFord on Saturday August 22, 2020 @06:34AM
(#24243175)
Could you link the article? I'm no statistician, but I do find his '50-54% delta is different than 95-99%' compelling.