New academic journal only publishes 'unsurprising' research rejected by others

Re:New academic journal only publishes 'unsurprising' resear... by ianhorn on Friday August 21, 2020 @11:21AM (#24235619)

I've been noticing a variant of this in myself lately. Maybe I think about some problem and stew on it and think to myself that it's probably not possible, or at least I can't come up with ideas. Then I hear that somebody else has made progress and suddenly I have a bunch of ideas. Somehow switching from "how could this work" or "can this work" to "how did they do it" leads me down entirely different paths.

I've been trying to get better at recognizing the bias and switching viewpoints without the external push.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New academic journal only publishes 'unsurprising' resear... by touisteur on Saturday August 22, 2020 @02:34PM (#24246169)

I often think about this Michael Abrash story: (chapter introduction) http://orangeti.de/OLD/graphics_programming_black_book/html/...

When I'm stuck, or getting close to stuck, I always try to assume what I want to do has already been done in some way. Long Google searches or discussions with domain experts, purposely vague, looking for similar ideas. Even a ridiculously not-so-related paper or mention in a paper will launch me in a idea-generation frenzy and I'll quickly build confidence.

Love M. Abrash's books. Shame he didn't keep writing them, they were inspirational for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New academic journal only publishes 'unsurprising' resear... by bumby on Friday August 21, 2020 @06:23PM (#24239502)

This is an interesting perspective that I think may exhibit itself in many domains. I’m reminded of the fact that the sub-four minute mile was impossible and then when it was first broken, many others completed the same feat in a relatively short period of time

[ Parent | on HN ]