News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra... by barry-cotter on Friday August 21, 2020 @10:37AM (#24235242)
The drivers were not investors in the company; it failing was not a huge problem for them. Having a strong preference for leisure is totally ok. The drivers didn’t have enough stock and weren’t paid enough to motivate them to work the hours the company needed to be viable. The company failed. The investors lost all their money. The founders and employees got nothing. That’s capitalism. If they’d been right they’d have made massive bank and that too would have been capitalism. Workers get to play capitalism too. Everyone played. Everyone made their choices and the company failed.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra... by kyle_martin1 on Friday August 21, 2020 @01:42PM (#24237123)
The drivers are franchisees so they have huge interest in keeping the company going, otherwise they wouldn't get any trips. It was their problem. They just didn't want to change.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra... by ric2b on Saturday August 22, 2020 @12:12PM (#24245071)
They can just drive for another company, they don't suffer any significant loss the same way a McDonald's restaurant would if McD's folded and had to overhaul the entire restaurant. The drivers just install another app on their phone.