News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra... by mardifoufs on Thursday August 20, 2020 @06:42PM (#24229869)
But not allowing those people to work with uber would just make them... even more dependant on the state? Either:

1) They are driving because it's the best opportunity available for them, and losing that possibility would force them to work less desirable/paying jobs, have less disposable income if uber is just a side gig for them or just end up unemployed. Which would lead to them contributing even less to their healthcare/education/etc costs.

Or

2) You are assuming that they are driving even if they can get 40h jobs with good benefits but just choose... not to? Or that if uber inevitably ends up closing their California operations, they will magically find those cushier jobs & those who drive to add to their income will just find an extremely flexible side gig that can net them hundreds of dollars a month?

I don't understand how unemployment is a more desirable outcome. Because uber will absolutely not pay for each of their driver's benefits. And that's even if they were able to afford it (they absolutely can't).

There are no comments on this comment yet.