Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra...
by chasd00 on Thursday August 20, 2020 @04:29PM
(#24228525)
If the people affected are against the law then how did it make it to a vote, let alone pass? that blows me away.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra...
by mindlar on Thursday August 20, 2020 @04:43PM
(#24228709)
California is a single party state with a supermajority of delegates. This means that Democrats can pass pretty much any law that they want without any real opposition.
The unions in California are unhappy with Uber/Lyft employees not being union members since their presence is an alternative (read danger) to some of the unions (teamsters/taxis). Unions have a lot more power with Democrats since they are some of their biggest supporters, so the legislature tends to do things that benefits unions.
Since California is effectively a single party state, the legislators that voted for this don't need to worry about things like being reelected because they are unlikely to actually see real opposition outside of a primary challenger.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra...
by tathougies on Thursday August 20, 2020 @05:51PM
(#24229448)
Exactly what the poster said. California is a single party state. There is no choice in most elections. Due to the way elections work, you're usually choosing between democrats who believe the same thing. There is no dissent.