* The taxi company, who offers fares to the driver * The driver, who operates the vehicle * The owner, who owns the vehicle
This means that at the end of the night, the taxi driver has to pay out to the taxi company and to the vehicle owner. This makes it very easy for a bad night to be a financial loss for the driver, since they still have to pay out regardless of whether they got good fares and tips or awful fares and tips.
Uber is a pretty standard black-car taxi service, with an app.
But either way that's irrelevant to the general point of whether Uber's general business model is that of a black-car taxi service.
The feature set doesn't have to match exactly to demonstrate that taxi service will not vanish instantly from California if Uber decides to leave - taxis existed before Uber and they will exist after.
Uber could increase fares and continue operating if they choose. If they decide it's not worth their time, c'est la vie, there will be others who fill this niche instead.
This is just a transparent ploy to use the employees as leverage to reduce their operating costs, they will actually continue operating here even if it passes.
Let's not beat around the bush, the appropriate term already exists, it's called a "taxi service". The fact that the taxi operators provide their own vehicles is not novel.