Re:Citibank's $900M Blunder
by megiddo on Thursday August 20, 2020 @03:15PM
(#24227451)
Finders keepers is actually a pretty strong argument in a case such as this.
For instance, years ago, I had a business account of mine attached because an employee with signatory privileges had a garnishment against him.
The judge ruled that since the lender that seized the money already had it, and I couldn't prove that the money wasn't absolutely, definitely not the property of the signatory (who was not an owner), we could split the money.
For instance, years ago, I had a business account of mine attached because an employee with signatory privileges had a garnishment against him.
The judge ruled that since the lender that seized the money already had it, and I couldn't prove that the money wasn't absolutely, definitely not the property of the signatory (who was not an owner), we could split the money.