Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition

Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by gvjddbnvdrbv on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @06:29PM (#24217535)

It seemed that way (I'm not certain it wasn't just incompetence in realising how quickly it was spreading). Then they did strict lockdown and worked hard to shield the most vulnerable. The shielding was poorly executed - like everything the UK government do.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by mehrdadn on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @06:44PM (#24217707)

Yeah so it's hard to see if we can use London as an example. Any other places that might be more representative?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by gvjddbnvdrbv on Thursday August 20, 2020 @03:21AM (#24220751)

They had 'spread the curve' type measures (stay home if sick and 'use common sense' etc) for 10 days. The infection rates carried on doubling during that time.

London is a perfect example of how quickly this thing can spread in a modern city and how many people get sick at once. The only reason the death rate wasn't way higher is that many many people self isolated for their own protection in early March.

I know less about New York but it sounds similar.

[ Parent | on HN ]