Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by dwaltrip on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @01:21PM
(#24213043)
We live in a society. There are rules and consequences to breaking them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by sneak on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @03:52PM
(#24215406)
Every society has this, it’s not really a valuable comment.
This seems like simply a dodge or dismissal of the legitimate criticism that breaking most of society’s rules should not cause an armed opponent to suddenly appear. It’s unreasonable and uncivilized and frequently results in the small-rule-breaker being physically abused or even murdered, especially if they aren’t white.
Your casual dismissal of these consequences suggests that you are never targeted by these people. For that I am glad. I hope everyone can be as callous about the consequences for minor rule breaking one day.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by dwaltrip on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @05:30PM
(#24216824)
The virus has killed 175k people. Brazenly defying pandemic restrictions is not “minor rule breaking”.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by bluGill on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:25PM
(#24214060)
That doesn't mean that we have to agree with the rules or the way they are enforced. However if you are not in agreement with the majority your options are war or not reporting others for their rule breaking. In general war is not a good option.