News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by bmsleight_ on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @01:10PM (#24212843)
>You can't just dismiss the fitness routines people have spent years choosing and refining and getting better.

I am not, It must be very hard, to take away something you love and trained.

Society is asking you to sacrifice a big thing for something that may not benefit society at all. The chances of you catching and then spreading are ~ 1/1000. Assuming a 1% mortality. We are asking 100,000 people to give up something they love to save one loved one.

My own value system is that my enjoyment is not worth 1/100,000 of a person life. I would say in the order of 1/1,000,000. Based upon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALARP is where I get my figure.

I am interested which figure you think is reasonable - 10^5 or 10^6 or between or higher or dismiss the risk entirely ?

Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by pyronik19 on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @01:36PM (#24213286)
Society is asking you to sacrifice a big thing for something that may not benefit society at all.

^ They definitely aren't asking

Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition by mitjak on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:23PM (#24214031)
are you really arguing there would be a higher chance of compliance if instead of making it law we resorted to politely asking?