Is the GPL not just as teenager-like with its radical openness? Wanting to maintain your values through a software license feels passive and sneaky and awkward, but that's how we do it. And if you value your labor and the labor of others, in a way the GPL does not, why not write that into the license?

Exactly. That's if the author believes in a sustainable anarcho-communist society which this license is geared towards.

I'd guess that this license is towards utopian ideals than actual reality.