Re:Zillow 2020 Urban-Suburban Market Report
by usaar333 on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @11:35PM
(#24206897)
> while prices are rocketing up in Mountain View and it's getting hard to find a SFH for < $2.7M, even if it's on a tiny 6-8K ft^2 lot.
Well, it's hard to find a home on such a large lot period (size is relative). Newer SFH tend to be built on 2k-3k square feet lot sizes and go for $1.5M to $2M (Mountain View median is $1.8M actually).
Prices generally have been going down in Mountain View (https://www.zillow.com/mountain-view-ca/home-values/) and remain considerably below their mid 2018 peak. (And still remain a bad deal relative to renting, but that's another story)
Re:Zillow 2020 Urban-Suburban Market Report
by 1DRACOSEA8 on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @11:45PM
(#24206944)
Size is absolutely not relative. Size in California and the rest of the country is measured in feet. That said, I single out this comment to prove the obvious abuse of the English language.
Re:Zillow 2020 Urban-Suburban Market Report
by JMTQp8lwXL on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @10:54PM
(#24206704)
Wouldn't Los Altos Hills be more desirable than Mountain View? Regardless of COVID or not. It's still centrally located, larger homes, larger lots, etc.
It also looks like both inventory and prices are rising, which is contradictory to standard economic theory but would make sense if we're nearing a market top.