Re:If founders treated their investors the same way they tre...
by chii on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @12:00PM
(#24200300)
Options being dangled in front of employees to trick them (only later to find out they can't afford to exercise it) is infuriating - it's almost fraud imo.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:If founders treated their investors the same way they tre...
by cs-szazz on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @01:19PM
(#24201394)
100% agree. I'm in the low 7-figures right now (on paper), and will probably be mid-7 with the next round of funding. So I have 0 chance of affording the taxes if I wanted to leave, and am kind of at the whim of the board if they want to extend my window.
It's not a great feeling, especially when you contributed a lot to the company at a very early stage. I am glad there's companies popping up to help with this problem, like ESO Fund, but in my opinion the companies should be trying to fix this instead.
Re:If founders treated their investors the same way they tre...
by nbclark on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @01:46PM
(#24201732)
Without knowing your exact situation, one thing to keep in mind is that the preferred value (last valuation / # of shares) of a share is generally a good bit higher than the tax liability (value of a common share from the 409a minus your strike). Still likely a big tax hit, but perhaps slightly better. IMO changes to tax law for illiquid assets is the best but most unlikely option here.