Re:Rolling blackouts in California have power experts stumped
by hkmurakami on Monday August 17, 2020 @06:06PM
(#24192775)
Makes sense -- Moody Road is a pretty dicey road for access and there's a decent number of homes that could easily be cut off there. Presumably in such a situation the opposite side access from Page Mill Road would be jeopardized as well.
Too bad the deadline has passed for nomination for LAH Town Council. You should run next time ;)
Re:Rolling blackouts in California have power experts stumped
by jldugger on Monday August 17, 2020 @06:49PM
(#24193190)
I've kinda wondered this for a while -- why is SVP (Santa Clara) cheaper than PG&E?
Re:Rolling blackouts in California have power experts stumped
by thephyber on Monday August 17, 2020 @07:37PM
(#24193574)
SVP isn't weighed down with debt from {the Erin Brockavitch lawsuit, the San Bruno gas explosion, the Paradise fire} incidents (among other, less infamous ones).
More likely, though, is that smaller and newer utilities are likely to be more nimble than the big behemoth that has lots of tech debt and internal and external bureaucracy.
Re:Rolling blackouts in California have power experts stumped
by kgermino on Monday August 17, 2020 @08:13PM
(#24193840)
I also wonder how much of it just comes down to serving a small dense area vs a large varied one. If you can focus on the cheapest customers to serve and avoid the overhead from needing to cover a large area it should be at least a little cheaper.
Re:Rolling blackouts in California have power experts stumped
by zbrozek on Monday August 17, 2020 @07:48PM
(#24193647)
As far as I can tell it's a cost-plus model. If PG&E wants to grow its revenue, it has to do something that costs more. They have a perverse incentive to make everything as expensive as possible.
https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/rate-plans/how-rates-w...
A simplistic napkin math computation says that the cost delta in electricity between what Santa Clara pays and what PG&E customers pay, times the amount of electricity that LAH residents consume would pay for the entire undergrounding in 5-6 years.
So to my mind, it seems like a simple argument in favor of a municipal power utility that charges PG&E rates until it pays off its infrastructure, and then charges a more reasonable rate thereafter. Of course this assumes that LAH could achieve Santa Clara levels of cost efficiency, but it doesn't seem crazy either.