News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by easde on Monday August 17, 2020 @05:01PM (#24192042)
Betterment is easy but if you have more than a few thousand bucks to invest I would just open a Vanguard account and put your money there. If you have no idea what you're doing just use a target date fund, otherwise just buy stock/bond ETFs in the mix that you want. Not worth ~0.4%/year in fees (doesn't sound like a lot until you realize it's $400/year on $100K) to have someone else do that for you.
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by brundolf on Monday August 17, 2020 @05:07PM (#24192108)
In the years I've been using it the fees have totaled 5.2% of the earnings over that time (current balance - invested, not total account balance). It's not nothing, but personally I place a high value on simplicity and peace of mind in my life, so it's worth it to have a simple and excellent user-experience in the app, as well as the ability to do things like withdraw and deposit with literally the tap of a button.
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by atombender on Monday August 17, 2020 @10:42PM (#24194740)
5.2% is crazy.

The target date fund I use, SWYJX (Schwab Target 2055 Index Fund) has a net ER of 0.08%. Over 25 years, the difference between 0.4% and 0.08% can be hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Like Betterment, SWYJX an automated portfolio, but one adjusted for age, not some individual profile.

Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by bobobob420 on Monday August 17, 2020 @11:12PM (#24194870)
Bruh 5.2 percent what are you doing giving investment advice lmao
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by mariomariomario on Monday August 17, 2020 @07:36PM (#24193567)
You're nuts if you think 5.2% is reasonable. Let's say for simplicity that's 1% per year for 5 years, if you chose VTSAX instead with an expense ratio of 0.04% (yes that's right) you're looking at total fees over 5 years of 0.2% versus 5%

Compound that 30 years out, you would loose hundreds of thousands of dollars for a pretty UI. Forget that, take a day and go setup a Bogleheads [1] portfolio.

[1] https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Three-fund_portfolio

Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by moneywoes on Monday August 17, 2020 @08:17PM (#24193881)
Did you get alpha
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by PascLeRasc on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @12:18AM (#24195219)
I'm willing to pay a 0.25% management fee to prevent SIM swapping attacks. Vanguard will not allow you to remove SMS as a 2FA option, and their Yubikey authentication doesn't work with Firefox, which is pretty unique. The little millennial brokerages (Robinhood, Wealthfront, Betterment) are all more secure.
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by vikiomega9 on Monday August 17, 2020 @06:03PM (#24192752)
Is there something specific about Vanguard that you use it for, I can buy ETFs on e-trade and other platforms right?
Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by atombender on Monday August 17, 2020 @10:32PM (#24194691)
Yes, you can. Vanguard is a brokerage, just like E-Trade, Schwab, Fidelity, etc. They provide all sorts products, such as IRAs.

A good reason to use Vanguard as a company is their mutual funds. (Though you can trade Vanguard mutual funds elsewhere, they'll usually come with transaction fees.) Mutual funds are arguably superior to ETFs for many investors, in a few ways.

* Mutual funds are fractional by nature — you can trade as little as $1. Right now, only a very small handful of brokers support fractional shares of ETFs.

* Since MFs aren't traded as whole units, you can set up automatic investing. Let a certain % of your paycheck go into the MF every month. Not possible with ETFs on most platforms, a notable exception being M1.

* Since MFs only settle their NAV once a day, you're discouraged from compulsively checking your portfolio every few hours. If the market is temporarily down, you won't see it reflected in real time. Some people consider the real-time aspect of ETFs superior, but for long-term investing, this lack of an instant dopamine rush means it's easier to just not think about it. Fewer emotional decisions.

* Mutual funds can be "funds of funds". Regulations prevent ETFs from doing the same thing. A good example of a FoF is Vanguard's target date retirement funds, which are nearly exactly equivalent to a Boglehead-style three-fund portfolio.

MFs have a reputation for being expensive, but Vanguard's have some of the lowest fees on the market. MFs also can be tax-inefficient, but Vanguard has patented a loophole that makes them as efficient as ETFs when held in a taxable account.

Vanguard is also a great company; easily my favourite investment company. Its ownership structure is inverted: The company is collectively owned by its funds, which means that you, as a MF shareholder, will own a part of Vanguard.

Note: The above points about MFs are largely moot with robo advisors like Betterment.

Re:Robinhood now valued at $11.2B with new fund backing by Drdrdrq on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @12:43AM (#24195344)
> MFs also can be tax-inefficient, but Vanguard has patented a loophole that makes them as efficient as ETFs when held in a taxable account.

Incredible... You weren't kidding: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-vanguard-mutual-fund...