Re:Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for...
by kingkawn on Monday August 17, 2020 @10:22AM
(#24187510)
Christmas is a primary method of indoctrinating people into scientific rationalism. The childhood imagination is fully engaged by this effort, unlike any other, to create the illusion of Santa Claus. As a kid it is a sort of bliss. Then as a sign of the transition to adulthood the growing child comes to realize there is no Santa. No time for mourning though, the growing youth is immediately brought into the fold and encouraged to help maintain the illusion for the younger children. The work is complete, the nature of fantasy and reality is established.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for...
by ancarda on Monday August 17, 2020 @10:26AM
(#24187557)
I find it fascinating how kids, without being told, eventually realize that Santa Clause isn't real. Is it because they never get to see him? "Mall Santas" are a common thing all over the world, so I don't think it can be that.
Re:Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for...
by JakeTheAndroid on Monday August 17, 2020 @04:36PM
(#24191728)
I think they do get told, just not in as direct of a manner.
Different things get dispelled that changes their foundation that Santa relies on. Such as magic isn't real. Without magic, how can Santa perform his job?
As they get older, it becomes 'childish' by peers to believe in things people 2 years younger believe.
Media created for the demographic starts hinting at the possibility of parents being Santa.
They're fed enough information over the years to piece it together by themselves.