Re:How Purism avoids Intel’s Active Management Technology
by zatop on Sunday August 16, 2020 @03:51PM
(#24180664)
That's why for the long term they mention:
"
We released a petition for, and continue to work with Intel to free it entirely (what Intel is calling a “ME-less” design).
"
Do you have a better solution that trying to neutralise it + starting a petition + talking with Intel to remove it ?
If you to want to criticize brands for selling privacy snakeoil, and not making you "the de facto owner of the machine" then we should address your criticism at Apple, not Purism
" We released a petition for, and continue to work with Intel to free it entirely (what Intel is calling a “ME-less” design). "
Do you have a better solution that trying to neutralise it + starting a petition + talking with Intel to remove it ?
If you to want to criticize brands for selling privacy snakeoil, and not making you "the de facto owner of the machine" then we should address your criticism at Apple, not Purism