News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA... by ptero on Sunday August 16, 2020 @01:20PM (#24179469)
This is a different case -- usually in this, it not that the retailer would not accept the item back; it is the manufacturer trying to prevent you from asking the store to take it back, as the store would then charge the expenses to the manufacturer.

If the manufacturer thinks a customer are missing some parts (for whatever reason, even if they broke them yourself) they will ship extra parts to avoid dealing with the store.

There are no comments on this comment yet.