Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by JonathonW on Sunday August 16, 2020 @11:11AM
(#24178428)
nVidia already makes CPUs and GPUs (they make the CPU that goes into the Nintendo Switch, for example). Buying ARM doesn’t change much in that regard, except that they can save on licensing fees and it puts them in a position to disrupt competitors who also produce ARM processors.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by stjohnswarts on Sunday August 16, 2020 @12:08PM
(#24178900)
I would think not licensing new IP would be the main concern. basically hogging ARM IP completely for themselves and their products. It would take a couple of years for companies and devs to switch to a different architecture, but you can be sure that there are competitors willing to fill that gap.
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by mekster on Sunday August 16, 2020 @03:54PM
(#24180688)
Why would nVidia disrupt competitors?
They need to pay $30bn to buy ARM which means they want to maximize the return for that purchase, which would be selling more and not disrupt for competitors to look elsewhere.