News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla’s Uncertain Future by stjohnswarts on Saturday August 15, 2020 @12:30PM (#24170096)
Real world benchmarks show they are neck and neck leap frogging each other all the time, so both of you are wrong; they're generally so close a human can't tell the difference, it's all biases these days unless someone shows you the numbers. Lots of people don't realize the extensions they add can also severely upset performance, but that's on the user. My 4 year old computer works just fine with both of them and 4 or 5 extensions.
Re:Mozilla’s Uncertain Future by seba_dos1 on Saturday August 15, 2020 @08:31PM (#24173711)
It also depends a lot on use cases and available resources. When on a single or just a few tabs, my perception usually favored Chrome, but in real usage I'm often keeping hundreds of tabs open and Firefox keeps being speedy enough most of the time while Chrome becomes unbearable very quickly.
Re:Mozilla’s Uncertain Future by Drdrdrq on Sunday August 16, 2020 @04:38AM (#24176232)
Agreed, with a caveat: on non-Google pages. Google is actively slowing down their pages on Firefox (or at least heavily optimizes them, but just on Chrome - which is the same).