News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by MattGaiser on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:27AM (#24167409)
Companies can’t win here unless they put a prohibitive number of onboarding questions at the start.

Many businesses would complain about the lost business if it didn’t automatically scale to meet demand.

Then there are the cost capped users who would rather the site be disabled due to over usage.

Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by StavrosK on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:36AM (#24167477)
The problem here was that the user didn't consent to scaling. They thought they were paying one rate, and got an email telling them they were paying another.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by gingerlime on Saturday August 15, 2020 @06:06AM (#24167630)
Completely agree. I think it's worse actually. It's not even about scaling. It's about having more staff users on the account.

> I was expected to stay on top of them or risk an automatic “upgrade” from $36 to $99 for having an extra staff user on my website? I had forgotten about this, but why not just block me from adding them?

So looks like Ghost allows you to add more members freely, does not warn or tell you anything when you do it, but then only tells you that you'll be upgraded automatically via email later? (It's partly a rhetorical question, but I genuinely don't know how it works).

Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by StavrosK on Saturday August 15, 2020 @06:11AM (#24167662)
Yes, that definitely seems to be what they do, and I understand why that frustrated the user. I think the CEO should have taken the frustration as feedback, even though the user wasn't very tactful on Twitter.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by nacs on Sunday August 16, 2020 @01:10PM (#24179391)
The user wasn't very tactful on Twitter but the CEO ramped that up to maximum levels with calling the user an "ahole"..
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by StavrosK on Sunday August 16, 2020 @01:13PM (#24179405)
Yeah, he really did, that wasn't awesome.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by masonic on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:43AM (#24167516)

  the user didn't consent to scaling
They didn't have to agree to TOS when onboarding?
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by StavrosK on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:45AM (#24167526)
Hahaha
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by ryanbrunner on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:34AM (#24167469)
I think that's a fair argument for things like external requests made to the site. For the number of admin users you have, there's no reason not to prompt you at the moment you add those admin users that you're going over plan though.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by gingerlime on Saturday August 15, 2020 @06:10AM (#24167658)
I just commented below to a sibling comment, but as far as I understand it, it's not about scaling here actually. It's about staff members.

But even if we talk about scaling here, As you noted different people will have different expectations. Some will prefer to get charged more and handle the extra traffic. Others will be the polar opposite and will prefer to cap unless they give explicit consent to upgrade.

I don't think you can avoid asking about it.

Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by giantDinosaur on Saturday August 15, 2020 @09:02AM (#24168547)
Isn't the question: 'do you want to enable some form of autoscaling?' the only one necessary here? How many other questions need to be asked? Sure - you can ask more if they select yes but otherwise that's the end of it, no?
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by tchaffee on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:37AM (#24167484)
It's a simple yes or no question if you want to handle it in onboarding. And loads of successful companies have tiered plans with hard limits.