News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by divan on Friday August 14, 2020 @04:48PM (#24163071)
Another animated QR data transfer that uses fountain codes: https://github.com/divan/txqr
Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by throwaway0x00ff on Saturday August 15, 2020 @09:13AM (#24168621)
Hey, I wanted to use your library to send data from computer A to computer B, but I don't speak Go yet.

How easy would it be to implement a txqr reader for desktop? Piping zbarcam's output could be the easiest way.

Have you got any directions for me to do it? It would be a great addition to txqr!

Thanks!

Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by divan on Saturday August 22, 2020 @04:44AM (#24242734)
I'm actually planning to make Go+Flutter application, which will work on iOS/Android, Desktop and Web. Out of curiosity, what's your use case?
Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by throwaway0x00ff on Saturday August 22, 2020 @01:51PM (#24245811)
I would use this in a security context.

I want to use a one-time pad with a friend. That requires generating a fully random file that I then need to send to my friend (physically). I don't have an Ethernet port on my machine to send the file on the wire, and I don't want to rely on weaker cryptography (WiFI, aes) to send this file (basically, everything is weaker than a one-time pad). I also don't want to leave undeletable traces of my one-time pad on a flash drive.

So what's left is the actual screen of the device, provided I don't have any hidden cameras where I live.

I could use a hard drive and then shred the secrets, but nothing is proven regarding the actual deletion of the files, and QR codes are much cooler!

Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by mleonhard on Saturday August 15, 2020 @02:18AM (#24166471)
Did you consider using the front camera for bidirectional phone-to-phone communication? That could allow frame re-transmits which would increase the data rate a lot.
Re:Show HN: Photo Realistic QR-Codes by divan on Saturday August 22, 2020 @04:46AM (#24242740)
That'd be definitely a whole new level, yes, but I think the simplicity of one-way diode communication has its own benefits.