Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better
by gnicholas on Friday August 14, 2020 @02:51AM
(#24154591)
I think your salary estimates aren't high enough. In California you're paying around 35% in state/fed income taxes, which means that with $225k gross you have $145k net of taxes and under $100k after living expenses. With $325k gross you're $160k after taxes and living expenses. Even starting at the top of your range, it gets you just over halfway there before investment gains.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better
by pembrook on Friday August 14, 2020 @07:31AM
(#24156541)
So OP was making 300k (roughly standard for a mid-level engineer in the Bay Area at about 20+ different companies here) and dumping 160k of it into index funds every year.
With the market basically doubling over the past 8 years with no inflation, and those returns compounded, it's clear to see how he got to $2m.
This doesn't account for any returns on company stock OP held on to (tech companies have basically doubled the return of the S&P over the past 10 years).
Whether you could replicate OP's experience over the next 10 years, is debatable.
Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better
by gnicholas on Friday August 14, 2020 @02:04PM
(#24161157)
The scenario you describe makes sounds plausible, but it isn’t “I saved $2.2M over my 8 year career”. “Save” ≠ invest in the stock market. The commenter made this seem like the low-risk alternative to taking VC funding, so relying on stock market returns is antithetical to that.