News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by mgkimsal on Thursday August 13, 2020 @11:20PM (#24152898)
> is the fear of being sued...

I can't discount it entirely, but... for many situations, that's probably a somewhat overblown fear. It's why you get insurance, pay professionals to do legal/paperwork stuff, and get on with your business. Almost anyone can sue for anything, but it probably doesn't happen anywhere near the number of times you might think it does. When you start, you're going to be too small to get sued in the first place. And being sued probably means you have paying customers, so you're already doing something right.

Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by ta1234567890 on Thursday August 13, 2020 @11:43PM (#24153056)
> too small to get sued in the first place. And being sued probably means you have paying customers

Apparently I'm the exception, but my business was pretty small (under $1M ARR), and one of our investors (which was also our largest client), sued us to pay his convertible note back. The company went bankrupt and after bankruptcy he sued my cofounder and I personally for the note. Still dealing with the whole thing. Every step of the way our other investors and lawyers were caught off guard, because the situation is apparently very rare, however, it still happened.

Having said that, knowing what I know now, I'd prefer to start a business, with all the issues and risks that it might entail, rather than let fear keep me from doing it. It's also been a hell of a learning experience and I'm sure it's all going to help me in the future.

Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by mgkimsal on Friday August 14, 2020 @03:47PM (#24162415)
interesting (sorry you had to deal with that).

"having investors" is perhaps a different sort of business than other small businesses that start up. many of the smaller businesses (esp software) don't have 'investors' as such, though some have taken out bank loans.

Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by ta1234567890 on Friday August 14, 2020 @08:43PM (#24164923)
You are totally right. And it will take me a very long time before I want to have investors again (if ever at all).
Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by gnicholas on Friday August 14, 2020 @01:17AM (#24153902)
Wow, sounds pretty crazy. Did the note have personal guarantees? My understanding is that kind of thing is very rare. If not, what grounds did he have for suing you personally? Fraudulent conveyance or breach of fiduciary duties? Something else?
Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by sushshshsh on Friday August 14, 2020 @09:58AM (#24158011)
It is not crazy and not rare. I can sue you right now, personally, and you would need to pay someone to defend you in court.

If you've never owned a business and have no relation to me, then probably you'll survive the suit just fine.

But as you can see, OP had a business relationship with the person involved, and though OP probably won the suit in the end, he still had to pay oodles of money to protect himself. And if he lost, well, then there's my point.

Re:Research Says Solo Founders Perform Better by ta1234567890 on Friday August 14, 2020 @11:40AM (#24159356)
The note did not have personal guarantees. But that didn't stop him from trying to claim alter ego. Like the sibling comment says, even if we win, we still need to pay tons of money to lawyers just to deal with it, and put in a lot of our time as well.

Our lawyers and other investors do think this situation is pretty rare, as the guy ended up killing the business that could have given him a better return on his money, and also screwed everyone else involved in the process.