Re:Docker update ToS: Image retention limits imposed on free...
by Nullabillity on Thursday August 13, 2020 @12:50PM
(#24145400)
That doesn't help against expiring base images though.. :/
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Docker update ToS: Image retention limits imposed on free...
by donmcronald on Thursday August 13, 2020 @02:08PM
(#24146267)
Yeah. That’ll be a mess. The way I try to do it is to build an image for a project’s build environment and then use that to build the project. The build env image never changes and stays around forever or as long as is needed. So when you have to patch something that hasn’t been touched for 5 years you can build with the old image instead of doing a big update to the build config of the project.
Many Docker based builds are not reproducible. Even something as simple as apt-get update failing with a zero exit code (it does this) adds complexity and most people don’t bother doing a deep dive.
Personally I use Sonatype Nexus and keep everything important in my own registry. I don’t trust any free offerings unless they’re self hosted.
Re:Docker update ToS: Image retention limits imposed on free...
by tensor on Thursday August 13, 2020 @02:47PM
(#24146778)
There needs to be a way to create a combined image of all dependencies to distribute with a Dockerfile and code. That way people could still modify the code and dockerfile.
Re:Docker update ToS: Image retention limits imposed on free...
by bananadonkey on Thursday August 13, 2020 @07:14PM
(#24150885)
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/save/
You already have the source, now you have a dist.