News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Young children would rather explore than get rewards by blobbers on Thursday August 13, 2020 @12:34PM (#24145209)
Isn't this the children solving the multi armed bandit problem?

In a child's mind, they haven't yet fully decided how things behave and react, so they are willing to try things to see if they've changed (because in fact often they do in their own mental models, as well as the resolution of those models.

If you think of it as a regression tree, their models start out fairly shallow and then slowly get deeper as they age. That's a square thing. That's a book. That's a book about animals. That's a book about marine animals. That's a book about marine animals that I like. That's a book about whales.

In trying to solve the multi armed bandit, they're willing to explore to try to find better rewards because in their own world there are often better rewards.

If the game shifted to having a different alien be the best one half way through the game, I'd be curious how quickly the more maturely cognitive kids did. It's possible that becoming fixated on something (the way adults are) can ultimately limit your abilities in a game. In adulthood, "creative" solutions can sometimes be better than more "standard" solutions, but incur more risk.

Re:Young children would rather explore than get rewards by mam2 on Thursday August 13, 2020 @05:02PM (#24149090)
Yes its called "simulated annealing for your own life".

In 3 days hacker news will discover GANs and make a shocking headline like "challenges and adversity makes you better / stronger".

#mindblown

Re:Young children would rather explore than get rewards by weatherman2 on Friday August 14, 2020 @08:14AM (#24156853)
I'm going to read my children a picture book titled "Scraggles the Puppy Explores the Forest of Simulated Annealing."
Re:Young children would rather explore than get rewards by blobbers on Thursday August 13, 2020 @06:27PM (#24150343)
Haha. Don't blame hackernews! This is social science encounters real research ;)