Re:Vitamin D, part 1: back to basics
by ibigb on Thursday August 13, 2020 @09:26AM
(#24143073)
For a review of many vitamin D studies google "site:theincidentaleconomist.com vitamin d", a blog by a doctor who evaluates many studies. Many do not show extra vitamin D beneficial.
Blog quoute: " The IOM says that anything over 20 ng/mL is “Generally considered adequate for bone and overall health in healthy individuals” and when you get over 50 ng/mL “Emerging evidence links potential adverse effects to such high levels”.
I do not understand why we keep looking for Vitamin D to be some sort of wonder drug. It’s seriously baffling to me."
So we need some,>20ng/ml but keep it under 50 ng/ml.
Blog quoute: " The IOM says that anything over 20 ng/mL is “Generally considered adequate for bone and overall health in healthy individuals” and when you get over 50 ng/mL “Emerging evidence links potential adverse effects to such high levels”. I do not understand why we keep looking for Vitamin D to be some sort of wonder drug. It’s seriously baffling to me."
So we need some,>20ng/ml but keep it under 50 ng/ml.