News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by reallydontask on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:53AM (#24130178)
> It found that queer females aged under 30 were charged the least, at just $6.99 per month, while city-based straight men over 50 were charged the most, at $34.37 a month.

Any Australians care to comment on the use of queer?

It's pretty derogatory in the UK (in the context of sexual orientation)

edit:

added, in the context of sexual orientation

edit 2:

looks like my knowledge is outdated then :)

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by theelous3 on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:05AM (#24130256)
The Q in lgbtq is queer, a term reappropriated a long time ago by the non-cis communities. I don't know of anywhere that thinks of it as a slur, unless you use it like one. Similarly, you can make any descriptor a negative with the right intonation.

"I wouldn't hire that woman."

"I wouldn't hire that woman"

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by dmurray on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:04AM (#24130246)
It's the "Q" in LGBTQ... so it's definitely a word that is being "reclaimed".

Pretty much any word can cause offence these days, but ABC have presumably been advised on a house style that is acceptable.

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by ictebres on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:00AM (#24130225)
I am not a native English speaker, but queer is repurposed by the LGBT community to include everyone, under a single name [1]. It can even include heterosexuality [2]. I definitely do not read it in any derogatory way, and would identify myself as queer.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_heterosexuality

Edit: formatting

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by schemy on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:06AM (#24130264)
It's an American term and like usual cultural imperialism means everyone else must use it too.
Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by nicoburns on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:50AM (#24130579)
> looks like my knowledge is outdated then :)

Yeah, I think this is partly a generational thing. My step-mum (in her 50s) was a bit taken a back when I used the word queer casually in conversation. But my 20-something friends in the gay/trans community pretty much all use queer to describe themselves.

I think it became popular partly as a reclamation of the word, and partly because the LGBTQIA acronym got so long and unwieldy. People want to be inclusive, but nobody wants to say LGBTQIA often.

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by reallydontask on Thursday August 13, 2020 @10:02AM (#24143422)
I need to get out more clearly, I'm only 43
Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by Edd314159 on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:04AM (#24130252)
I'm in the UK and I don't get the sense that it's derogatory (though I'm a straight male myself, so maybe I'm not the best judge)

Isn't "queer" the Q in LGBTQ, an acronym that most will happily identify with? Perhaps it _used_ to be derogatory, but it appears has been redefined into something positive.

Re:Older men charged more for using Tinder's premium service by p1necone on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:59AM (#24130219)
I'm in New Zealand and queer is used by the gay community as a positive/less specific term here.