News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Never use a dependency that you could replace with an aft... by cogman10 on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @07:00PM (#24126956)
Depends on the form that `str = ch + str` takes inside the loop. But yeah, the way they wrote the code makes it less likely to work well.

    let padding = '';
    for (let i = 0; i < len; ++i)
      padding += ch;
    return padding + str;
The above would probably get caught by the JIT and would essentially be optimized to what `ch.repeat(len) + str;` would do.

There are no comments on this comment yet.