Therefore, it's not a real problem that Jeff Bezos owns 10% of Amazon. You wouldn't be any better off if he owned 9% or worse off if he owned 11% instead. It's a wedge issue.

Right. It's much more of a problem that his employees are getting less value than they create for the company, and he is taking a lot of the difference. Since all billionaires have made their fortunes this way (or inheriting from someone who did), billionaires should not exist.

P.S. He owns 11.1% and had more before his divorce.

That in no way follows.

Well....

If he owned 9% instead of 10% and I owned the difference of 1%, then I would be better off.

And if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle.

If half of Jeff's shares were transferred to a non-profit organization that assists homeless people, would that make a physical difference in the world, or would it have no effect?